ANNEX 2
UNDERSTANDING ON RULES AND
PROCEDURES
GOVERNING THE SETTLEMENT OF
DISPUTES
Members hereby agree as follows:
Article 1
Coverage and Application
1. The rules and procedures of this
Understanding shall apply to disputes brought pursuant to the
consultation and dispute settlement
provisions of the agreements listed in Appendix 1 to this
Understanding (referred to in this
Understanding as the "covered agreements"). The rules and procedures
of this Understanding shall also apply
to consultations and the settlement of disputes between Members
concerning their rights and obligations
under the provisions of the Agreement Establishing the World
Trade Organization (referred to in this
Understanding as the "WTO Agreement") and of this Understanding
taken in isolation or in combination
with any other covered agreement.
2. The rules and procedures of this
Understanding shall apply subject to such special or additional
rules and procedures on dispute
settlement contained in the covered agreements as are identified in
Appendix 2 to this Understanding. To
the extent that there is a difference between the rules and
procedures of this Understanding and
the special or additional rules and procedures set forth in
Appendix 2, the special or additional
rules and procedures in Appendix 2 shall prevail. In disputes
involving rules and procedures under
more than one covered agreement, if there is a conflict between
special or additional rules and
procedures of such agreements under review, and where the parties to
the dispute cannot agree on rules and
procedures within 20 days of the establishment of the panel, the
Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body
provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 2 (referred to in this
Understanding as the "DSB"),
in consultation with the parties to the dispute, shall determine the rules
and procedures to be followed within 10
days after a request by either Member. The Chairman shall
be guided by the principle that special
or additional rules and procedures should be used where possible,
and the rules and procedures set out in
this Understanding should be used to the extent necessary to
avoid conflict.
Article 2
Administration
1. The Dispute Settlement Body is
hereby established to administer these rules and procedures
and, except as otherwise provided in a
covered agreement, the consultation and dispute settlement
provisions of the covered agreements.
Accordingly, the DSB shall have the authority to establish panels,
adopt panel and Appellate Body reports,
maintain surveillance of implementation of rulings and
recommendations, and authorize
suspension of concessions and other obligations under the covered
agreements. With respect to disputes
arising under a covered agreement which is a Plurilateral Trade
Agreement, the term "Member"
as used herein shall refer only to those Members that are parties to
the relevant Plurilateral Trade
Agreement. Where the DSB administers the dispute settlement provisions
of a Plurilateral Trade Agreement, only
those Members that are parties to that Agreement may participate
in decisions or actions taken by the
DSB with respect to that dispute.
Page 354
2. The DSB shall inform the relevant
WTO Councils and Committees of any developments in
disputes related to provisions of the
respective covered agreements.
3. The DSB shall meet as often as
necessary to carry out its functions within the time-frames
provided in this Understanding.
4. Where the rules and procedures of
this Understanding provide for the DSB to take a decision,
it shall do so by consensus.1
Article 3
General Provisions
1. Members affirm their adherence to
the principles for the management of disputes heretofore
applied under Articles XXII and XXIII
of GATT 1947, and the rules and procedures as further elaborated
and modified herein.
2. The dispute settlement system of the
WTO is a central element in providing security and
predictability to the multilateral
trading system. The Members recognize that it serves to preserve the
rights and obligations of Members under
the covered agreements, and to clarify the existing provisions
of those agreements in accordance with
customary rules of interpretation of public international law.
Recommendations and rulings of the DSB
cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided
in the covered agreements.
3. The prompt settlement of situations
in which a Member considers that any benefits accruing
to it directly or indirectly under the
covered agreements are being impaired by measures taken by another
Member is essential to the effective
functioning of the WTO and the maintenance of a proper balance
between the rights and obligations of
Members.
4. Recommendations or rulings made by
the DSB shall be aimed at achieving a satisfactory
settlement of the matter in accordance
with the rights and obligations under this Understanding and
under the covered agreements.
5. All solutions to matters formally
raised under the consultation and dispute settlement provisions
of the covered agreements, including
arbitration awards, shall be consistent with those agreements and
shall not nullify or impair benefits
accruing to any Member under those agreements, nor impede the
attainment of any objective of those
agreements.
6. Mutually agreed solutions to matters
formally raised under the consultation and dispute settlement
provisions of the covered agreements
shall be notified to the DSB and the relevant Councils and
Committees, where any Member may raise
any point relating thereto.
7. Before bringing a case, a Member
shall exercise its judgement as to whether action under these
procedures would be fruitful. The aim
of the dispute settlement mechanism is to secure a positive
solution to a dispute. A solution
mutually acceptable to the parties to a dispute and consistent with
the covered agreements is clearly to be
preferred. In the absence of a mutually agreed solution, the
first objective of the dispute
settlement mechanism is usually to secure the withdrawal of the measures
concerned if these are found to be
inconsistent with the provisions of any of the covered agreements.
The provision of compensation should be
resorted to only if the immediate withdrawal of the measure
1The
DSB shall be deemed to have decided by consensus on a matter submitted for its
consideration, if no Member, present
at the meeting of the DSB when the
decision is taken, formally objects to the proposed decision.
Page 355
is impracticable and as a temporary
measure pending the withdrawal of the measure which is inconsistent
with a covered agreement. The last
resort which this Understanding provides to the Member invoking
the dispute settlement procedures is
the possibility of suspending the application of concessions or other
obligations under the covered
agreements on a discriminatory basis vis-à-vis the other Member, subject
to authorization by the DSB of such
measures.
8. In cases where there is an
infringement of the obligations assumed under a covered agreement,
the action is considered prima facie
to constitute a case of nullification or impairment. This means
that there is normally a presumption
that a breach of the rules has an adverse impact on other Members
parties to that covered agreement, and
in such cases, it shall be up to the Member against whom the
complaint has been brought to rebut the
charge.
9. The provisions of this Understanding
are without prejudice to the rights of Members to seek
authoritative interpretation of
provisions of a covered agreement through decision-making under the
WTO Agreement or a covered agreement
which is a Plurilateral Trade Agreement.
10. It is understood that requests for
conciliation and the use of the dispute settlement procedures
should not be intended or considered as
contentious acts and that, if a dispute arises, all Members will
engage in these procedures in good
faith in an effort to resolve the dispute. It is also understood that
complaints and counter-complaints in
regard to distinct matters should not be linked.
11. This Understanding shall be applied
only with respect to new requests for consultations under
the consultation provisions of the
covered agreements made on or after the date of entry into force
of the WTO Agreement. With respect to
disputes for which the request for consultations was made
under GATT 1947 or under any other
predecessor agreement to the covered agreements before the
date of entry into force of the WTO
Agreement, the relevant dispute settlement rules and procedures
in effect immediately prior to the date
of entry into force of the WTO Agreement shall continue to
apply.2
12. Notwithstanding paragraph 11, if a
complaint based on any of the covered agreements is brought
by a developing country Member against
a developed country Member, the complaining party shall
have the right to invoke, as an
alternative to the provisions contained in Articles 4, 5, 6 and 12 of this
Understanding, the corresponding provisions
of the Decision of 5 April 1966 (BISD 14S/18), except
that where the Panel considers that the
time-frame provided for in paragraph 7 of that Decision is
insufficient to provide its report and
with the agreement of the complaining party, that time-frame may
be extended. To the extent that there
is a difference between the rules and procedures of Articles 4,
5, 6 and 12 and the corresponding rules
and procedures of the Decision, the latter shall prevail.
Article 4
Consultations
1. Members affirm their resolve to
strengthen and improve the effectiveness of the consultation
procedures employed by Members.
2This
paragraph shall also be applied to disputes on which panel reports have not
been adopted or fully implemented.
Page 356
2. Each Member undertakes to accord
sympathetic consideration to and afford adequate opportunity
for consultation regarding any
representations made by another Member concerning measures affecting
the operation of any covered agreement
taken within the territory of the former.3
3. If a request for consultations is
made pursuant to a covered agreement, the Member to which
the request is made shall, unless
otherwise mutually agreed, reply to the request within 10 days after
the date of its receipt and shall enter
into consultations in good faith within a period of no more than
30 days after the date of receipt of
the request, with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution.
If the Member does not respond within
10 days after the date of receipt of the request, or does not
enter into consultations within a
period of no more than 30 days, or a period otherwise mutually agreed,
after the date of receipt of the
request, then the Member that requested the holding of consultations
may proceed directly to request the
establishment of a panel.
4. All such requests for consultations
shall be notified to the DSB and the relevant Councils and
Committees by the Member which requests
consultations. Any request for consultations shall be
submitted in writing and shall give the
reasons for the request, including identification of the measures
at issue and an indication of the legal
basis for the complaint.
5. In the course of consultations in
accordance with the provisions of a covered agreement, before
resorting to further action under this
Understanding, Members should attempt to obtain satisfactory
adjustment of the matter.
6. Consultations shall be confidential,
and without prejudice to the rights of any Member in any
further proceedings.
7. If the consultations fail to settle
a dispute within 60 days after the date of receipt of the request
for consultations, the complaining
party may request the establishment of a panel. The complaining
party may request a panel during the
60-day period if the consulting parties jointly consider that
consultations have failed to settle the
dispute.
8. In cases of urgency, including those
which concern perishable goods, Members shall enter into
consultations within a period of no
more than 10 days after the date of receipt of the request. If the
consultations have failed to settle the
dispute within a period of 20 days after the date of receipt of
the request, the complaining party may
request the establishment of a panel.
9. In cases of urgency, including those
which concern perishable goods, the parties to the dispute,
panels and the Appellate Body shall
make every effort to accelerate the proceedings to the greatest
extent possible.
10. During consultations Members should
give special attention to the particular problems and
interests of developing country
Members.
11. Whenever a Member other than the
consulting Members considers that it has a substantial trade
interest in consultations being held
pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article XXII of GATT 1994, paragraph 1
of Article XXII of GATS, or the
corresponding provisions in other covered agreements4, such Member
3Where
the provisions of any other covered agreement concerning measures taken by
regional or local governments or
authorities within the territory of a
Member contain provisions different from the provisions of this paragraph, the
provisions
of such other covered agreement shall
prevail.
4The
corresponding consultation provisions in the covered agreements are listed
hereunder: Agreement on Agriculture,
Article 19; Agreement on the
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, paragraph 1 of Article 11;
Agreement
on Textiles and Clothing, paragraph 4
of Article 8; Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, paragraph 1 of Article
14;
Page 357
may notify the consulting Members and
the DSB, within 10 days after the date of the circulation of
the request for consultations under
said Article, of its desire to be joined in the consultations. Such
Member shall be joined in the
consultations, provided that the Member to which the request for
consultations was addressed agrees that
the claim of substantial interest is well-founded. In that event
they shall so inform the DSB. If the
request to be joined in the consultations is not accepted, the
applicant Member shall be free to
request consultations under paragraph 1 of Article XXII or paragraph 1
of Article XXIII of GATT 1994,
paragraph 1 of Article XXII or paragraph 1 of Article XXIII of GATS,
or the corresponding provisions in
other covered agreements.
Article 5
Good Offices, Conciliation
and Mediation
1. Good offices, conciliation and
mediation are procedures that are undertaken voluntarily if the
parties to the dispute so agree.
2. Proceedings involving good offices,
conciliation and mediation, and in particular positions taken
by the parties to the dispute during
these proceedings, shall be confidential, and without prejudice to
the rights of either party in any
further proceedings under these procedures.
3. Good offices, conciliation or
mediation may be requested at any time by any party to a dispute.
They may begin at any time and be
terminated at any time. Once procedures for good offices,
conciliation or mediation are
terminated, a complaining party may then proceed with a request for the
establishment of a panel.
4. When good offices, conciliation or
mediation are entered into within 60 days after the date
of receipt of a request for
consultations, the complaining party must allow a period of 60 days after
the date of receipt of the request for
consultations before requesting the establishment of a panel. The
complaining party may request the
establishment of a panel during the 60-day period if the parties to
the dispute jointly consider that the
good offices, conciliation or mediation process has failed to settle
the dispute.
5. If the parties to a dispute agree,
procedures for good offices, conciliation or mediation may
continue while the panel process
proceeds.
6. The Director-General may, acting in
an ex officio capacity, offer good offices, conciliation
or mediation with the view to assisting
Members to settle a dispute.
Agreement on Trade-Related Investment
Measures, Article 8; Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994,
paragraph 2 of Article 17; Agreement on
Implementation of Article VII of GATT 1994, paragraph 2 of Article 19;
Agreement
on Preshipment Inspection, Article 7;
Agreement on Rules of Origin, Article 7; Agreement on Import Licensing
Procedures,
Article 6; Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures, Article 30; Agreement on Safeguards, Article 14;
Agreement
on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights, Article 64.1; and any corresponding consultation
provisions in
Plurilateral Trade Agreements as
determined by the competent bodies of each Agreement and as notified to the
DSB.
Page 358
Article 6
Establishment of Panels
1. If the complaining party so
requests, a panel shall be established at the latest at the DSB meeting
following that at which the request
first appears as an item on the DSB's agenda, unless at that meeting
the DSB decides by consensus not to establish
a panel.5
2. The request for the establishment of
a panel shall be made in writing. It shall indicate whether
consultations were held, identify the
specific measures at issue and provide a brief summary of the
legal basis of the complaint sufficient
to present the problem clearly. In case the applicant requests
the establishment of a panel with other
than standard terms of reference, the written request shall include
the proposed text of special terms of
reference.
Article 7
Terms of Reference of Panels
1. Panels shall have the following
terms of reference unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise
within 20 days from the establishment
of the panel:
"To examine, in the light of the
relevant provisions in (name of the covered agreement(s)
cited by the parties to the dispute),
the matter referred to the DSB by (name of party) in
document ... and to make such findings
as will assist the DSB in making the recommendations
or in giving the rulings provided for
in that/those agreement(s)."
2. Panels shall address the relevant
provisions in any covered agreement or agreements cited by
the parties to the dispute.
3. In establishing a panel, the DSB may
authorize its Chairman to draw up the terms of reference
of the panel in consultation with the
parties to the dispute, subject to the provisions of paragraph 1.
The terms of reference thus drawn up
shall be circulated to all Members. If other than standard terms
of reference are agreed upon, any
Member may raise any point relating thereto in the DSB.
Article 8
Composition of Panels
1. Panels shall be composed of
well-qualified governmental and/or non-governmental individuals,
including persons who have served on or
presented a case to a panel, served as a representative of a
Member or of a contracting party to
GATT 1947 or as a representative to the Council or Committee
of any covered agreement or its
predecessor agreement, or in the Secretariat, taught or published on
international trade law or policy, or
served as a senior trade policy official of a Member.
2. Panel members should be selected
with a view to ensuring the independence of the members,
a sufficiently diverse background and a
wide spectrum of experience.
5If
the complaining party so requests, a meeting of the DSB shall be convened for
this purpose within 15 days of the
request, provided that at least 10
days' advance notice of the meeting is given.
Page 359
3. Citizens of Members whose
governments6 are parties to the dispute
or third parties as defined
in paragraph 2 of Article 10 shall not
serve on a panel concerned with that dispute, unless the parties
to the dispute agree otherwise.
4. To assist in the selection of
panelists, the Secretariat shall maintain an indicative list of
governmental and non-governmental
individuals possessing the qualifications outlined in paragraph
1, from which panelists may be drawn as
appropriate. That list shall include the roster of nongovernmental
panelists established on 30 November
1984 (BISD 31S/9), and other rosters and indicative
lists established under any of the
covered agreements, and shall retain the names of persons on those
rosters and indicative lists at the
time of entry into force of the WTO Agreement. Members may
periodically suggest names of
governmental and non-governmental individuals for inclusion on the
indicative list, providing relevant
information on their knowledge of international trade and of the sectors
or subject matter of the covered
agreements, and those names shall be added to the list upon approval
by the DSB. For each of the individuals
on the list, the list shall indicate specific areas of experience
or expertise of the individuals in the
sectors or subject matter of the covered agreements.
5. Panels shall be composed of three
panelists unless the parties to the dispute agree, within 10 days
from the establishment of the panel, to
a panel composed of five panelists. Members shall be informed
promptly of the composition of the
panel.
6. The Secretariat shall propose
nominations for the panel to the parties to the dispute. The parties
to the dispute shall not oppose
nominations except for compelling reasons.
7. If there is no agreement on the
panelists within 20 days after the date of the establishment of
a panel, at the request of either
party, the Director-General, in consultation with the Chairman of the
DSB and the Chairman of the relevant
Council or Committee, shall determine the composition of the
panel by appointing the panelists whom
the Director-General considers most appropriate in accordance
with any relevant special or additional
rules or procedures of the covered agreement or covered
agreements which are at issue in the
dispute, after consulting with the parties to the dispute. The
Chairman of the DSB shall inform the
Members of the composition of the panel thus formed no later
than 10 days after the date the
Chairman receives such a request.
8. Members shall undertake, as a
general rule, to permit their officials to serve as panelists.
9. Panelists shall serve in their
individual capacities and not as government representatives, nor
as representatives of any organization.
Members shall therefore not give them instructions nor seek
to influence them as individuals with
regard to matters before a panel.
10. When a dispute is between a
developing country Member and a developed country Member
the panel shall, if the developing
country Member so requests, include at least one panelist from a
developing country Member.
11. Panelists' expenses, including
travel and subsistence allowance, shall be met from the WTO
budget in accordance with criteria to
be adopted by the General Council, based on recommendations
of the Committee on Budget, Finance and
Administration.
6In
the case where customs unions or common markets are parties to a dispute, this
provision applies to citizens of all
member countries of the customs unions
or common markets.
Page 360
Article 9
Procedures for Multiple
Complainants
1. Where more than one Member requests
the establishment of a panel related to the same matter,
a single panel may be established to
examine these complaints taking into account the rights of all
Members concerned. A single panel
should be established to examine such complaints whenever feasible.
2. The single panel shall organize its
examination and present its findings to the DSB in such
a manner that the rights which the
parties to the dispute would have enjoyed had separate panels examined
the complaints are in no way impaired.
If one of the parties to the dispute so requests, the panel shall
submit separate reports on the dispute
concerned. The written submissions by each of the complainants
shall be made available to the other
complainants, and each complainant shall have the right to be present
when any one of the other complainants
presents its views to the panel.
3. If more than one panel is established
to examine the complaints related to the same matter,
to the greatest extent possible the
same persons shall serve as panelists on each of the separate panels
and the timetable for the panel process
in such disputes shall be harmonized.
Article 10
Third Parties
1. The interests of the parties to a
dispute and those of other Members under a covered agreement
at issue in the dispute shall be fully
taken into account during the panel process.
2. Any Member having a substantial
interest in a matter before a panel and having notified its
interest to the DSB (referred to in
this Understanding as a "third party") shall have an opportunity to
be heard by the panel and to make
written submissions to the panel. These submissions shall also be
given to the parties to the dispute and
shall be reflected in the panel report.
3. Third parties shall receive the
submissions of the parties to the dispute to the first meeting of
the panel.
4. If a third party considers that a
measure already the subject of a panel proceeding nullifies or
impairs benefits accruing to it under
any covered agreement, that Member may have recourse to normal
dispute settlement procedures under
this Understanding. Such a dispute shall be referred to the original
panel wherever possible.
Article 11
Function of Panels
The function of panels is to assist the
DSB in discharging its responsibilities under this
Understanding and the covered
agreements. Accordingly, a panel should make an objective assessment
of the matter before it, including an
objective assessment of the facts of the case and the applicability
of and conformity with the relevant
covered agreements, and make such other findings as will assist
the DSB in making the recommendations
or in giving the rulings provided for in the covered agreements.
Panels should consult regularly with
the parties to the dispute and give them adequate opportunity to
develop a mutually satisfactory
solution.
Page 361
Article 12
Panel Procedures
1. Panels shall follow the Working
Procedures in Appendix 3 unless the panel decides otherwise
after consulting the parties to the
dispute.
2. Panel procedures should provide
sufficient flexibility so as to ensure high-quality panel reports,
while not unduly delaying the panel
process.
3. After consulting the parties to the
dispute, the panelists shall, as soon as practicable and whenever
possible within one week after the
composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon, fix the timetable for the panel
process, taking into account the provisions of paragraph 9 of
Article 4, if relevant.
4. In determining the timetable for the
panel process, the panel shall provide sufficient time for
the parties to the dispute to prepare
their submissions.
5. Panels should set precise deadlines
for written submissions by the parties and the parties should
respect those deadlines.
6. Each party to the dispute shall
deposit its written submissions with the Secretariat for immediate
transmission to the panel and to the
other party or parties to the dispute. The complaining party shall
submit its first submission in advance
of the responding party's first submission unless the panel decides,
in fixing the timetable referred to in
paragraph 3 and after consultations with the parties to the dispute,
that the parties should submit their
first submissions simultaneously. When there are sequential
arrangements for the deposit of first
submissions, the panel shall establish a firm time-period for receipt
of the responding party's submission.
Any subsequent written submissions shall be submitted
simultaneously.
7. Where the parties to the dispute
have failed to develop a mutually satisfactory solution, the
panel shall submit its findings in the
form of a written report to the DSB. In such cases, the report
of a panel shall set out the findings
of fact, the applicability of relevant provisions and the basic rationale
behind any findings and recommendations
that it makes. Where a settlement of the matter among the
parties to the dispute has been found,
the report of the panel shall be confined to a brief description
of the case and to reporting that a
solution has been reached.
8. In order to make the procedures more
efficient, the period in which the panel shall conduct
its examination, from the date that the
composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed
upon until the date the final report is
issued to the parties to the dispute, shall, as a general rule, not
exceed six months. In cases of urgency,
including those relating to perishable goods, the panel shall
aim to issue its report to the parties
to the dispute within three months.
9. When the panel considers that it
cannot issue its report within six months, or within three months
in cases of urgency, it shall inform
the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an
estimate of the period within which it
will issue its report. In no case should the period from the
establishment of the panel to the
circulation of the report to the Members exceed nine months.
10. In the context of consultations
involving a measure taken by a developing country Member,
the parties may agree to extend the
periods established in paragraphs 7 and 8 of Article 4. If, after
the relevant period has elapsed, the
consulting parties cannot agree that the consultations have concluded,
the Chairman of the DSB shall decide,
after consultation with the parties, whether to extend the relevant
period and, if so, for how long. In
addition, in examining a complaint against a developing country
Page 362
Member, the panel shall accord sufficient
time for the developing country Member to prepare and present
its argumentation. The provisions of
paragraph 1 of Article 20 and paragraph 4 of Article 21 are not
affected by any action pursuant to this
paragraph.
11. Where one or more of the parties is
a developing country Member, the panel's report shall
explicitly indicate the form in which
account has been taken of relevant provisions on differential and
more-favourable treatment for
developing country Members that form part of the covered agreements
which have been raised by the
developing country Member in the course of the dispute settlement
procedures.
12. The panel may suspend its work at
any time at the request of the complaining party for a period
not to exceed 12 months. In the event
of such a suspension, the time-frames set out in paragraphs
8 and 9 of this Article, paragraph 1 of
Article 20, and paragraph 4 of Article 21 shall be extended
by the amount of time that the work was
suspended. If the work of the panel has been suspended for
more than 12 months, the authority for
establishment of the panel shall lapse.
Article 13
Right to Seek Information
1. Each panel shall have the right to
seek information and technical advice from any individual
or body which it deems appropriate.
However, before a panel seeks such information or advice from
any individual or body within the
jurisdiction of a Member it shall inform the authorities of that Member.
A Member should respond promptly and
fully to any request by a panel for such information as the
panel considers necessary and
appropriate. Confidential information which is provided shall not be
revealed without formal authorization
from the individual, body, or authorities of the Member providing
the information.
2. Panels may seek information from any
relevant source and may consult experts to obtain their
opinion on certain aspects of the
matter. With respect to a factual issue concerning a scientific or other
technical matter raised by a party to a
dispute, a panel may request an advisory report in writing from
an expert review group. Rules for the
establishment of such a group and its procedures are set forth
in Appendix 4.
Article 14
Confidentiality
1. Panel deliberations shall be
confidential.
2. The reports of panels shall be
drafted without the presence of the parties to the dispute in the
light of the information provided and
the statements made.
3. Opinions expressed in the panel
report by individual panelists shall be anonymous.
Page 363
Article 15
Interim Review Stage
1. Following the consideration of
rebuttal submissions and oral arguments, the panel shall issue
the descriptive (factual and argument)
sections of its draft report to the parties to the dispute. Within
a period of time set by the panel, the
parties shall submit their comments in writing.
2. Following the expiration of the set
period of time for receipt of comments from the parties
to the dispute, the panel shall issue
an interim report to the parties, including both the descriptive sections
and the panel's findings and conclusions.
Within a period of time set by the panel, a party may submit
a written request for the panel to
review precise aspects of the interim report prior to circulation of
the final report to the Members. At the
request of a party, the panel shall hold a further meeting with
the parties on the issues identified in
the written comments. If no comments are received from any
party within the comment period, the
interim report shall be considered the final panel report and
circulated promptly to the Members.
3. The findings of the final panel
report shall include a discussion of the arguments made at the
interim review stage. The interim
review stage shall be conducted within the time-period set out in
paragraph 8 of Article 12.
Article 16
Adoption of Panel Reports
1. In order to provide sufficient time
for the Members to consider panel reports, the reports shall
not be considered for adoption by the
DSB until 20 days after the date they have been circulated to
the Members.
2. Members having objections to a panel
report shall give written reasons to explain their objections
for circulation at least 10 days prior
to the DSB meeting at which the panel report will be considered.
3. The parties to a dispute shall have
the right to participate fully in the consideration of the panel
report by the DSB, and their views
shall be fully recorded.
4. Within 60 days after the date of
circulation of a panel report to the Members, the report shall
be adopted at a DSB meeting7 unless a party to the dispute formally notifies the DSB
of its decision
to appeal or the DSB decides by
consensus not to adopt the report. If a party has notified its decision
to appeal, the report by the panel
shall not be considered for adoption by the DSB until after completion
of the appeal. This adoption procedure
is without prejudice to the right of Members to express their
views on a panel report.
7If a
meeting of the DSB is not scheduled within this period at a time that enables
the requirements of paragraphs 1 and 4
of Article 16 to be met, a meeting of
the DSB shall be held for this purpose.
Page 364
Article 17
Appellate Review
Standing Appellate Body
1. A standing Appellate Body shall be
established by the DSB. The Appellate Body shall hear
appeals from panel cases. It shall be
composed of seven persons, three of whom shall serve on any
one case. Persons serving on the
Appellate Body shall serve in rotation. Such rotation shall be
determined in the working procedures of
the Appellate Body.
2. The DSB shall appoint persons to
serve on the Appellate Body for a four-year term, and each
person may be reappointed once.
However, the terms of three of the seven persons appointed immediately
after the entry into force of the WTO
Agreement shall expire at the end of two years, to be determined
by lot. Vacancies shall be filled as
they arise. A person appointed to replace a person whose term
of office has not expired shall hold
office for the remainder of the predecessor's term.
3. The Appellate Body shall comprise
persons of recognized authority, with demonstrated expertise
in law, international trade and the
subject matter of the covered agreements generally. They shall be
unaffiliated with any government. The
Appellate Body membership shall be broadly representative
of membership in the WTO. All persons
serving on the Appellate Body shall be available at all times
and on short notice, and shall stay
abreast of dispute settlement activities and other relevant activities
of the WTO. They shall not participate
in the consideration of any disputes that would create a direct
or indirect conflict of interest.
4. Only parties to the dispute, not
third parties, may appeal a panel report. Third parties which
have notified the DSB of a substantial
interest in the matter pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 10 may
make written submissions to, and be
given an opportunity to be heard by, the Appellate Body.
5. As a general rule, the proceedings
shall not exceed 60 days from the date a party to the dispute
formally notifies its decision to
appeal to the date the Appellate Body circulates its report. In fixing
its timetable the Appellate Body shall
take into account the provisions of paragraph 9 of Article 4, if
relevant. When the Appellate Body
considers that it cannot provide its report within 60 days, it shall
inform the DSB in writing of the
reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within
which it will submit its report. In no
case shall the proceedings exceed 90 days.
6. An appeal shall be limited to issues
of law covered in the panel report and legal interpretations
developed by the panel.
7. The Appellate Body shall be provided
with appropriate administrative and legal support as it
requires.
8. The expenses of persons serving on
the Appellate Body, including travel and subsistence
allowance, shall be met from the WTO
budget in accordance with criteria to be adopted by the General
Council, based on recommendations of
the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration.
Procedures for Appellate
Review
9. Working procedures shall be drawn up
by the Appellate Body in consultation with the Chairman
of the DSB and the Director-General,
and communicated to the Members for their information.
Page 365
10. The proceedings of the Appellate
Body shall be confidential. The reports of the Appellate Body
shall be drafted without the presence
of the parties to the dispute and in the light of the information
provided and the statements made.
11. Opinions expressed in the Appellate
Body report by individuals serving on the Appellate Body
shall be anonymous.
12. The Appellate Body shall address
each of the issues raised in accordance with paragraph 6
during the appellate proceeding.
13. The Appellate Body may uphold,
modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the
panel.
Adoption of Appellate Body
Reports
14. An Appellate Body report shall be
adopted by the DSB and unconditionally accepted by the
parties to the dispute unless the DSB
decides by consensus not to adopt the Appellate Body report within
30 days following its circulation to
the Members.8 This adoption procedure is
without prejudice to the
right of Members to express their views
on an Appellate Body report.
Article 18
Communications with the
Panel or Appellate Body
1. There shall be no ex parte communications
with the panel or Appellate Body concerning matters
under consideration by the panel or
Appellate Body.
2. Written submissions to the panel or
the Appellate Body shall be treated as confidential, but
shall be made available to the parties
to the dispute. Nothing in this Understanding shall preclude a
party to a dispute from disclosing
statements of its own positions to the public. Members shall treat
as confidential information submitted
by another Member to the panel or the Appellate Body which
that Member has designated as
confidential. A party to a dispute shall also, upon request of a Member,
provide a non-confidential summary of
the information contained in its written submissions that could
be disclosed to the public.
Article 19
Panel and Appellate Body
Recommendations
1. Where a panel or the Appellate Body
concludes that a measure is inconsistent with a covered
agreement, it shall recommend that the
Member concerned9 bring
the measure into conformity with
that agreement.10 In addition to its recommendations, the panel or Appellate Body may
suggest ways
in which the Member concerned could
implement the recommendations.
8If a
meeting of the DSB is not scheduled during this period, such a meeting of the
DSB shall be held for this purpose.
9The
"Member concerned" is the party to the dispute to which the panel or
Appellate Body recommendations are directed.
10With
respect to recommendations in cases not involving a violation of GATT 1994 or
any other covered agreement,
see Article 26.
Page 366
2. In accordance with paragraph 2 of
Article 3, in their findings and recommendations, the panel
and Appellate Body cannot add to or
diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered
agreements.
Article 20
Time-frame for DSB
Decisions
Unless otherwise agreed to by the
parties to the dispute, the period from the date of establishment
of the panel by the DSB until the date
the DSB considers the panel or appellate report for adoption
shall as a general rule not exceed nine
months where the panel report is not appealed or 12 months
where the report is appealed. Where
either the panel or the Appellate Body has acted, pursuant to
paragraph 9 of Article 12 or paragraph
5 of Article 17, to extend the time for providing its report, the
additional time taken shall be added to
the above periods.
Article 21
Surveillance of
Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings
1. Prompt compliance with
recommendations or rulings of the DSB is essential in order to ensure
effective resolution of disputes to the
benefit of all Members.
2. Particular attention should be paid
to matters affecting the interests of developing country
Members with respect to measures which
have been subject to dispute settlement.
3. At a DSB meeting held within 30 days11 after the date of adoption of the panel or Appellate
Body report, the Member concerned shall
inform the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation
of the recommendations and rulings of
the DSB. If it is impracticable to comply immediately with
the recommendations and rulings, the
Member concerned shall have a reasonable period of time in
which to do so. The reasonable period
of time shall be:
(a) the period of time proposed by the
Member concerned, provided that such period is
approved by the DSB; or, in the absence
of such approval,
(b) a period of time mutually agreed by
the parties to the dispute within 45 days after the
date of adoption of the recommendations
and rulings; or, in the absence of such
agreement,
(c) a period of time determined through
binding arbitration within 90 days after the date
of adoption of the recommendations and
rulings.12 In such arbitration, a
guideline for
the arbitrator13 should be that the reasonable period of time to implement panel or
Appellate Body recommendations should
not exceed 15 months from the date of adoption
of a panel or Appellate Body report.
However, that time may be shorter or longer,
depending upon the particular
circumstances.
11If a
meeting of the DSB is not scheduled during this period, such a meeting of the
DSB shall be held for this purpose.
12If
the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator within ten days after referring the
matter to arbitration, the arbitrator shall
be appointed by the Director-General
within ten days, after consulting the parties.
13The
expression "arbitrator" shall be interpreted as referring either to
an individual or a group.
Page 367
4. Except where the panel or the
Appellate Body has extended, pursuant to paragraph 9 of Article 12
or paragraph 5 of Article 17, the time
of providing its report, the period from the date of establishment
of the panel by the DSB until the date
of determination of the reasonable period of time shall not exceed
15 months unless the parties to the
dispute agree otherwise. Where either the panel or the Appellate
Body has acted to extend the time of
providing its report, the additional time taken shall be added to
the 15-month period; provided that
unless the parties to the dispute agree that there are exceptional
circumstances, the total time shall not
exceed 18 months.
5. Where there is disagreement as to
the existence or consistency with a covered agreement of
measures taken to comply with the
recommendations and rulings such dispute shall be decided through
recourse to these dispute settlement
procedures, including wherever possible resort to the original panel.
The panel shall circulate its report
within 90 days after the date of referral of the matter to it. When
the panel considers that it cannot
provide its report within this time frame, it shall inform the DSB
in writing of the reasons for the delay
together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit
its report.
6. The DSB shall keep under
surveillance the implementation of adopted recommendations or
rulings. The issue of implementation of
the recommendations or rulings may be raised at the DSB
by any Member at any time following
their adoption. Unless the DSB decides otherwise, the issue
of implementation of the
recommendations or rulings shall be placed on the agenda of the DSB meeting
after six months following the date of
establishment of the reasonable period of time pursuant to paragraph
3 and shall remain on the DSB's agenda
until the issue is resolved. At least 10 days prior to each such
DSB meeting, the Member concerned shall
provide the DSB with a status report in writing of its progress
in the implementation of the
recommendations or rulings.
7. If the matter is one which has been
raised by a developing country Member, the DSB shall
consider what further action it might
take which would be appropriate to the circumstances.
8. If the case is one brought by a developing
country Member, in considering what appropriate
action might be taken, the DSB shall
take into account not only the trade coverage of measures
complained of, but also their impact on
the economy of developing country Members concerned.
Article 22
Compensation and the
Suspension of Concessions
1. Compensation and the suspension of
concessions or other obligations are temporary measures
available in the event that the
recommendations and rulings are not implemented within a reasonable
period of time. However, neither
compensation nor the suspension of concessions or other obligations
is preferred to full implementation of
a recommendation to bring a measure into conformity with the
covered agreements. Compensation is
voluntary and, if granted, shall be consistent with the covered
agreements.
2. If the Member concerned fails to
bring the measure found to be inconsistent with a covered
agreement into compliance therewith or
otherwise comply with the recommendations and rulings within
the reasonable period of time
determined pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 21, such Member shall,
if so requested, and no later than the
expiry of the reasonable period of time, enter into negotiations
with any party having invoked the
dispute settlement procedures, with a view to developing mutually
acceptable compensation. If no
satisfactory compensation has been agreed within 20 days after the
date of expiry of the reasonable period
of time, any party having invoked the dispute settlement
procedures may request authorization
from the DSB to suspend the application to the Member concerned
of concessions or other obligations
under the covered agreements.
Page 368
3. In considering what concessions or
other obligations to suspend, the complaining party shall
apply the following principles and
procedures:
(a) the general principle is that the
complaining party should first seek to suspend
concessions or other obligations with
respect to the same sector(s) as that in which
the panel or Appellate Body has found a
violation or other nullification or impairment;
(b) if that party considers that it is
not practicable or effective to suspend concessions or
other obligations with respect to the
same sector(s), it may seek to suspend concessions
or other obligations in other sectors
under the same agreement;
(c) if that party considers that it is
not practicable or effective to suspend concessions or
other obligations with respect to other
sectors under the same agreement, and that the
circumstances are serious enough, it
may seek to suspend concessions or other obligations
under another covered agreement;
(d) in applying the above principles,
that party shall take into account:
(i) the trade in the sector or under
the agreement under which the panel or
Appellate Body has found a violation or
other nullification or impairment, and
the importance of such trade to that
party;
(ii) the broader economic elements
related to the nullification or impairment and
the broader economic consequences of
the suspension of concessions or other
obligations;
(e) if that party decides to request
authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations
pursuant to subparagraphs (b) or (c),
it shall state the reasons therefor in its request.
At the same time as the request is
forwarded to the DSB, it also shall be forwarded
to the relevant Councils and also, in
the case of a request pursuant to subparagraph (b),
the relevant sectoral bodies;
(f) for purposes of this paragraph,
"sector" means:
(i) with respect to goods, all goods;
(ii) with respect to services, a
principal sector as identified in the current "Services
Sectoral Classification List"
which identifies such sectors;14
(iii) with respect to trade-related
intellectual property rights, each of the categories
of intellectual property rights covered
in Section 1, or Section 2, or Section 3,
or Section 4, or Section 5, or Section
6, or Section 7 of Part II, or the
obligations under Part III, or Part IV
of the Agreement on TRIPS;
(g) for purposes of this paragraph,
"agreement" means:
(i) with respect to goods, the
agreements listed in Annex 1A of the WTO
Agreement, taken as a whole as well as
the Plurilateral Trade Agreements in
so far as the relevant parties to the
dispute are parties to these agreements;
(ii) with respect to services, the
GATS;
14The
list in document MTN.GNS/W/120 identifies eleven sectors.
Page 369
(iii) with respect to intellectual
property rights, the Agreement on TRIPS.
4. The level of the suspension of
concessions or other obligations authorized by the DSB shall
be equivalent to the level of the
nullification or impairment.
5. The DSB shall not authorize
suspension of concessions or other obligations if a covered agreement
prohibits such suspension.
6. When the situation described in
paragraph 2 occurs, the DSB, upon request, shall grant
authorization to suspend concessions or
other obligations within 30 days of the expiry of the reasonable
period of time unless the DSB decides
by consensus to reject the request. However, if the Member
concerned objects to the level of
suspension proposed, or claims that the principles and procedures
set forth in paragraph 3 have not been
followed where a complaining party has requested authorization
to suspend concessions or other
obligations pursuant to paragraph 3(b) or (c), the matter shall be referred
to arbitration. Such arbitration shall
be carried out by the original panel, if members are available, or
by an arbitrator15 appointed by the Director-General and shall be completed
within 60 days after the
date of expiry of the reasonable period
of time. Concessions or other obligations shall not be suspended
during the course of the arbitration.
7. The arbitrator16 acting pursuant to paragraph 6 shall not examine the
nature of the concessions
or other obligations to be suspended
but shall determine whether the level of such suspension is equivalent
to the level of nullification or
impairment. The arbitrator may also determine if the proposed suspension
of concessions or other obligations is
allowed under the covered agreement. However, if the matter
referred to arbitration includes a
claim that the principles and procedures set forth in paragraph 3 have
not been followed, the arbitrator shall
examine that claim. In the event the arbitrator determines that
those principles and procedures have
not been followed, the complaining party shall apply them consistent
with paragraph 3. The parties shall
accept the arbitrator's decision as final and the parties concerned
shall not seek a second arbitration.
The DSB shall be informed promptly of the decision of the arbitrator
and shall upon request, grant
authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations where the request
is consistent with the decision of the
arbitrator, unless the DSB decides by consensus to reject the request.
8. The suspension of concessions or
other obligations shall be temporary and shall only be applied
until such time as the measure found to
be inconsistent with a covered agreement has been removed,
or the Member that must implement
recommendations or rulings provides a solution to the nullification
or impairment of benefits, or a
mutually satisfactory solution is reached. In accordance with paragraph 6
of Article 21, the DSB shall continue
to keep under surveillance the implementation of adopted
recommendations or rulings, including
those cases where compensation has been provided or concessions
or other obligations have been
suspended but the recommendations to bring a measure into conformity
with the covered agreements have not
been implemented.
9. The dispute settlement provisions of
the covered agreements may be invoked in respect of
measures affecting their observance
taken by regional or local governments or authorities within the
territory of a Member. When the DSB has
ruled that a provision of a covered agreement has not been
observed, the responsible Member shall
take such reasonable measures as may be available to it to
ensure its observance. The provisions
of the covered agreements and this Understanding relating to
15The
expression"arbitrator" shall be interpreted as referring either to an
individual or a group.
16The
expression "arbitrator" shall be interpreted as referring either to
an individual or a group or to the members of the
original panel when serving in the
capacity of arbitrator.
Page 370
compensation and suspension of
concessions or other obligations apply in cases where it has not been
possible to secure such observance.17
Article 23
Strengthening of the
Multilateral System
1. When Members seek the redress of a
violation of obligations or other nullification or impairment
of benefits under the covered
agreements or an impediment to the attainment of any objective of the
covered agreements, they shall have
recourse to, and abide by, the rules and procedures of this
Understanding.
2. In such cases, Members shall:
(a) not make a determination to the
effect that a violation has occurred, that benefits have
been nullified or impaired or that the
attainment of any objective of the covered
agreements has been impeded, except
through recourse to dispute settlement in
accordance with the rules and
procedures of this Understanding, and shall make any
such determination consistent with the
findings contained in the panel or Appellate
Body report adopted by the DSB or an
arbitration award rendered under this
Understanding;
(b) follow the procedures set forth in
Article 21 to determine the reasonable period of time
for the Member concerned to implement
the recommendations and rulings; and
(c) follow the procedures set forth in
Article 22 to determine the level of suspension of
concessions or other obligations and
obtain DSB authorization in accordance with those
procedures before suspending
concessions or other obligations under the covered
agreements in response to the failure
of the Member concerned to implement the
recommendations and rulings within that
reasonable period of time.
Article 24
Special Procedures
Involving Least-Developed Country Members
1. At all stages of the determination
of the causes of a dispute and of dispute settlement procedures
involving a least-developed country
Member, particular consideration shall be given to the special situation
of least-developed country Members. In
this regard, Members shall exercise due restraint in raising
matters under these procedures
involving a least-developed country Member. If nullification or
impairment is found to result from a
measure taken by a least-developed country Member, complaining
parties shall exercise due restraint in
asking for compensation or seeking authorization to suspend the
application of concessions or other obligations
pursuant to these procedures.
2. In dispute settlement cases
involving a least-developed country Member, where a satisfactory
solution has not been found in the
course of consultations the Director-General or the Chairman of
the DSB shall, upon request by a
least-developed country Member offer their good offices, conciliation
and mediation with a view to assisting
the parties to settle the dispute, before a request for a panel
17Where
the provisions of any covered agreement concerning measures taken by regional
or local governments or authorities
within the territory of a Member
contain provisions different from the provisions of this paragraph, the
provisions of such
covered agreement shall prevail.
Page 371
is made. The Director-General or the Chairman
of the DSB, in providing the above assistance, may
consult any source which either deems
appropriate.
Article 25
Arbitration
1. Expeditious arbitration within the
WTO as an alternative means of dispute settlement can facilitate
the solution of certain disputes that
concern issues that are clearly defined by both parties.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this
Understanding, resort to arbitration shall be subject to
mutual agreement of the parties which
shall agree on the procedures to be followed. Agreements to
resort to arbitration shall be notified
to all Members sufficiently in advance of the actual commencement
of the arbitration process.
3. Other Members may become party to an
arbitration proceeding only upon the agreement of
the parties which have agreed to have
recourse to arbitration. The parties to the proceeding shall agree
to abide by the arbitration award.
Arbitration awards shall be notified to the DSB and the Council
or Committee of any relevant agreement
where any Member may raise any point relating thereto.
4. Articles 21 and 22 of this
Understanding shall apply mutatis mutandis to arbitration awards.
Article 26
1. Non-Violation Complaints of the
Type Described in Paragraph 1(b) of Article XXIII of
GATT 1994
Where the provisions of paragraph 1(b)
of Article XXIII of GATT 1994 are applicable to a
covered agreement, a panel or the
Appellate Body may only make rulings and recommendations where
a party to the dispute considers that
any benefit accruing to it directly or indirectly under the relevant
covered agreement is being nullified or
impaired or the attainment of any objective of that Agreement
is being impeded as a result of the
application by a Member of any measure, whether or not it conflicts
with the provisions of that Agreement. Where
and to the extent that such party considers and a panel
or the Appellate Body determines that a
case concerns a measure that does not conflict with the provisions
of a covered agreement to which the
provisions of paragraph 1(b) of Article XXIII of GATT 1994 are
applicable, the procedures in this
Understanding shall apply, subject to the following:
(a) the complaining party shall present
a detailed justification in support of any complaint
relating to a measure which does not
conflict with the relevant covered agreement;
(b) where a measure has been found to
nullify or impair benefits under, or impede the
attainment of objectives, of the
relevant covered agreement without violation thereof,
there is no obligation to withdraw the
measure. However, in such cases, the panel or
the Appellate Body shall recommend that
the Member concerned make a mutually
satisfactory adjustment;
(c) notwithstanding the provisions of
Article 21, the arbitration provided for in paragraph 3
of Article 21, upon request of either party,
may include a determination of the level
of benefits which have been nullified
or impaired, and may also suggest ways and means
of reaching a mutually satisfactory
adjustment; such suggestions shall not be binding
upon the parties to the dispute;
Page 372
(d) notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraph 1 of Article 22, compensation may be part
of a mutually satisfactory adjustment
as final settlement of the dispute.
2. Complaints of the Type Described
in Paragraph 1(c) of Article XXIII of GATT 1994
Where the provisions of paragraph 1(c)
of Article XXIII of GATT 1994 are applicable to a
covered agreement, a panel may only
make rulings and recommendations where a party considers that
any benefit accruing to it directly or
indirectly under the relevant covered agreement is being nullified
or impaired or the attainment of any
objective of that Agreement is being impeded as a result of the
existence of any situation other than
those to which the provisions of paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b) of
Article XXIII of GATT 1994 are
applicable. Where and to the extent that such party considers and
a panel determines that the matter is
covered by this paragraph, the procedures of this Understanding
shall apply only up to and including
the point in the proceedings where the panel report has been
circulated to the Members. The dispute
settlement rules and procedures contained in the Decision of
12 April 1989 (BISD 36S/61-67) shall
apply to consideration for adoption, and surveillance and
implementation of recommendations and
rulings. The following shall also apply:
(a) the complaining party shall present
a detailed justification in support of any argument
made with respect to issues covered
under this paragraph;
(b) in cases involving matters covered
by this paragraph, if a panel finds that cases also
involve dispute settlement matters
other than those covered by this paragraph, the panel
shall circulate a report to the DSB
addressing any such matters and a separate report
on matters falling under this
paragraph.
Article 27
Responsibilities of the
Secretariat
1. The Secretariat shall have the
responsibility of assisting panels, especially on the legal, historical
and procedural aspects of the matters
dealt with, and of providing secretarial and technical support.
2. While the Secretariat assists
Members in respect of dispute settlement at their request, there
may also be a need to provide
additional legal advice and assistance in respect of dispute settlement
to developing country Members. To this
end, the Secretariat shall make available a qualified legal
expert from the WTO technical
cooperation services to any developing country Member which so
requests. This expert shall assist the
developing country Member in a manner ensuring the continued
impartiality of the Secretariat.
3. The Secretariat shall conduct
special training courses for interested Members concerning these
dispute settlement procedures and
practices so as to enable Members' experts to be better informed
in this regard.
Page 373
APPENDIX 1
AGREEMENTS COVERED BY THE UNDERSTANDING
(A) Agreement Establishing the World
Trade Organization
(B) Multilateral Trade Agreements
Annex 1A: Multilateral Agreements on
Trade in Goods
Annex 1B: General Agreement on Trade in
Services
Annex 1C: Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
Annex 2: Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(C) Plurilateral Trade Agreements
Annex 4: Agreement on Trade in Civil
Aircraft
Agreement on Government Procurement
International Dairy Agreement
International Bovine Meat Agreement
The applicability of this Understanding
to the Plurilateral Trade Agreements shall be subject
to the adoption of a decision by the
parties to each agreement setting out the terms for the application
of the Understanding to the individual
agreement, including any special or additional rules or procedures
for inclusion in Appendix 2, as
notified to the DSB.
Page 374
APPENDIX 2
SPECIAL OR ADDITIONAL RULES AND
PROCEDURES
CONTAINED IN THE COVERED AGREEMENTS
Agreement Rules and Procedures
Agreement on the Application of
Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures 11.2
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing
2.14, 2.21, 4.4, 5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 6.9,
6.10, 6.11, 8.1 through 8.12
Agreement on Technical Barriers to
Trade 14.2 through 14.4, Annex 2
Agreement on Implementation of Article
VI
of GATT 1994 17.4 through 17.7
Agreement on Implementation of Article
VII
of GATT 1994 19.3 through 19.5, Annex
II.2(f), 3, 9, 21
Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures 4.2 through 4.12, 6.6, 7.2 through 7.10, 8.5,
footnote 35, 24.4, 27.7, Annex V
General Agreement on Trade in Services
XXII:3, XXIII:3
Annex on Financial Services 4
Annex on Air Transport Services 4
Decision on Certain Dispute Settlement
Procedures for the GATS 1 through 5
The list of rules and procedures in
this Appendix includes provisions where only a part of the
provision may be relevant in this
context.
Any special or additional rules or
procedures in the Plurilateral Trade Agreements as determined
by the competent bodies of each
agreement and as notified to the DSB.
Page 375
APPENDIX 3
WORKING PROCEDURES
l. In its proceedings the panel shall
follow the relevant provisions of this Understanding. In addition,
the following working procedures shall
apply.
2. The panel shall meet in closed session.
The parties to the dispute, and interested parties, shall
be present at the meetings only when
invited by the panel to appear before it.
3. The deliberations of the panel and
the documents submitted to it shall be kept confidential.
Nothing in this Understanding shall
preclude a party to a dispute from disclosing statements of its own
positions to the public. Members shall
treat as confidential information submitted by another Member
to the panel which that Member has
designated as confidential. Where a party to a dispute submits
a confidential version of its written
submissions to the panel, it shall also, upon request of a Member,
provide a non-confidential summary of
the information contained in its submissions that could be
disclosed to the public.
4. Before the first substantive meeting
of the panel with the parties, the parties to the dispute shall
transmit to the panel written
submissions in which they present the facts of the case and their arguments.
5. At its first substantive meeting
with the parties, the panel shall ask the party which has brought
the complaint to present its case.
Subsequently, and still at the same meeting, the party against which
the complaint has been brought shall be
asked to present its point of view.
6. All third parties which have
notified their interest in the dispute to the DSB shall be invited in
writing to present their views during a
session of the first substantive meeting of the panel set aside
for that purpose. All such third
parties may be present during the entirety of this session.
7. Formal rebuttals shall be made at a
second substantive meeting of the panel. The party complained
against shall have the right to take
the floor first to be followed by the complaining party. The parties
shall submit, prior to that meeting,
written rebuttals to the panel.
8. The panel may at any time put
questions to the parties and ask them for explanations either in
the course of a meeting with the
parties or in writing.
9. The parties to the dispute and any
third party invited to present its views in accordance with
Article 10 shall make available to the
panel a written version of their oral statements.
10. In the interest of full
transparency, the presentations, rebuttals and statements referred to in
paragraphs 5 to 9 shall be made in the
presence of the parties. Moreover, each party's written
submissions, including any comments on
the descriptive part of the report and responses to questions
put by the panel, shall be made
available to the other party or parties.
11. Any additional procedures specific
to the panel.
Page 376
12. Proposed timetable for panel work:
(a) Receipt of first written
submissions of the parties:
(1) complaining Party: _______ 3-6
weeks
(2) Party complained against: _______
2-3 weeks
(b) Date, time and place of first
substantive meeting
with the parties; third party session:
_______ 1-2 weeks
(c) Receipt of written rebuttals of the
parties: _______ 2-3 weeks
(d) Date, time and place of second
substantive
meeting with the parties: _______ 1-2
weeks
(e) Issuance of descriptive part of the
report to the parties: _______ 2-4 weeks
(f) Receipt of comments by the parties
on the
descriptive part of the report: _______
2 weeks
(g) Issuance of the interim report,
including the
findings and conclusions, to the parties:
_______ 2-4 weeks
(h) Deadline for party to request
review of part(s) of report: _______ 1 week
(i) Period of review by panel,
including possible
additional meeting with parties:
_______ 2 weeks
(j) Issuance of final report to parties
to dispute: _______ 2 weeks
(k) Circulation of the final report to
the Members: _______ 3 weeks
The above calendar may be changed in
the light of unforeseen developments. Additional meetings
with the parties shall be scheduled if
required.
Page 377
APPENDIX 4
EXPERT REVIEW GROUPS
The following rules and procedures
shall apply to expert review groups established in accordance
with the provisions of paragraph 2 of
Article 13.
1. Expert review groups are under the
panel's authority. Their terms of reference and detailed working
procedures shall be decided by the
panel, and they shall report to the panel.
2. Participation in expert review
groups shall be restricted to persons of professional standing and
experience in the field in question.
3. Citizens of parties to the dispute shall
not serve on an expert review group without the joint
agreement of the parties to the
dispute, except in exceptional circumstances when the panel considers
that the need for specialized
scientific expertise cannot be fulfilled otherwise. Government officials
of parties to the dispute shall not
serve on an expert review group. Members of expert review groups
shall serve in their individual
capacities and not as government representatives, nor as representatives
of any organization. Governments or
organizations shall therefore not give them instructions with regard
to matters before an expert review
group.
4. Expert review groups may consult and
seek information and technical advice from any source
they deem appropriate. Before an expert
review group seeks such information or advice from a source
within the jurisdiction of a Member, it
shall inform the government of that Member. Any Member
shall respond promptly and fully to any
request by an expert review group for such information as the
expert review group considers necessary
and appropriate.
5. The parties to a dispute shall have
access to all relevant information provided to an expert review
group, unless it is of a confidential
nature. Confidential information provided to the expert review
group shall not be released without
formal authorization from the government, organization or person
providing the information. Where such
information is requested from the expert review group but release
of such information by the expert
review group is not authorized, a non-confidential summary of the
information will be provided by the
government, organization or person supplying the information.
6. The expert review group shall submit
a draft report to the parties to the dispute with a view to
obtaining their comments, and taking
them into account, as appropriate, in the final report, which shall
also be issued to the parties to the
dispute when it is submitted to the panel. The final report of the
expert review group shall be advisory
only.